Lynn Sweeting writes about true journalistic freedom here, on her blog. Here's some of what she has to say:
I was a reporter in that newsroom for about eight years. During the bad days of the â€œPindling regimeâ€, (Christ, was it really a regime?). As I recall there was an endless stream of English â€œeditorsâ€ at that desk throughout. As I recall the paper lambasted Pindlingâ€™s government every single day. Still, one English man after another was still able to get a work permit. They put hell on the government every day in their editorials and in their front page stories, and as I recall their freedom to do this was never threatened. There were no arrests, no one was thrown in jail never to be seen again, there were no killings, there were no disappearances, the paper didnâ€™t get shut down, and their work permits were not denied. As I recall they went to print with stories that put the PLP in a stinking light every day and that regime never disallowed them to do it.If we were not a free press then, and if they are not now, there is only the Tribune to blame. I was only there for a few years, but I can think of five or ten good and dedicated reporters and photographers from my time alone who were forced to leave their employ and even give up their dreams of real journalism, because there wasnâ€™t a hope in hell of Going Further, there would be no training opportunities, there would be no chance of an upwardly moving career, there was no chance of ever reaching the editorâ€™s chair, no chance of ever making a decent salary, no chance for advancement whatsoever.
Lynn's writing about the John Marquis controversy, which changes meaning as it changes reporters and perspectives.Â Here's Oswald Brown on the subject, and here's more on the topic, this time from the Tribune itself. Below are some more links of interest.Bahamas Uncensored.comNassau Guardian OpinionWeblog Bahamas on the subjectBut Lynn, as always, has a voice that's unique.